Last night, I stayed up reading far later than I should have. Today, through the hangover like haze, I can see that it was a huge mistake, not only because I'm tired and I should be cleaning the house for a parental visit and family dinner tonight, but because the book wasn't good. At all.
So why did I keep reading a book that delivered on almost nothing it promised? Part of it was the hope that the book would pick up speed. I don't like to think that I wasted my money, even if it was only a few dollars, so I'm the type of reader who holds out hope that if it's in print, it will get better.
Unfortunately, with self-publishing being all the rage right now, you can no longer trust that every book is going to be a good one. Or even a semi-decent one. I could throw together some of the first stories I ever wrote without looking at them and have them listed online by the end of today. That doesn't mean anyone will feel satisfied after reading them, so I won't do it. To me, if I'm going to put my name on a book and sell it, there has to be value to the reader. If there's not, those first time readers will run the other way when I publish something else. Which is what I will probably do with this particular author from now on.
Once I realized it wasn't getting any better and probably wouldn't, I kept going. Why? Because I'm getting ready to write my first novel and if this book wasn't a shining example of how to structure a book, it could be a tool for me. I wound up making mental notes of everything that annoyed me about the story and the characters so I can avoid those issues like the plague in my own novel.
What annoyed me the most, yes, even more than a bad storyline with flat, unbelievable characters, is the fact that at the end of the book, she not only asked for reviews, but she is having a giveaway and the way to enter the contest is to write a review. Personally, I think it's tacky to ask for reviews IN your book, but to go one step further and hold a contest for those who share reviews, that's over a line for me. I wonder what my odds of winning would be if I wrote an honest review of the book. Is the winner going to be someone who proclaims that this is a work of literary greatness or does someone who says "an editor would be a better use of your money" have a chance to win?
I'm not a seasoned veteran in the world of writing. After years of dabbling, I'm just now beginning to take myself seriously, so I could be completely off-base with my opinions. At the same time, I'm not putting this out there as a professional writer, I'm putting this out there as an avid reader who also happens to write. In my "other life" I help bloggers learn how to improve their sites and one of the most common pieces of advice is that if something annoys you when you're reading, it's probably a good idea to not expect others to like it when they're reading what you've written.
Hi, just dropping in to touch based. Have you been really busy with Nano stuff lately?
ReplyDelete